This article evaluates studio headphones based on professional audio standards, manufacturer specifications, community consensus among mixing engineers, and real-world application in professional studios. Our research includes analysis of frequency response measurements, professional audio forum discussions, and industry adoption patterns. We've compiled feedback from audio professionals to identify which models consistently deliver the accuracy needed for professional mixing work.
Important disclosure:Links to products are for reference purposes. This guide is designed to help you make informed decisions based on technical specifications and professional use cases, not to push any particular brand.
Why Your Current Headphones Probably Aren't Built for Mixing
Here's what matters when you're evaluating headphones for professional work: consumer headphones are engineered for enjoyment, not accuracy. Manufacturers intentionally boost bass frequencies (around 100Hz) to make music sound fuller, enhance treble (around 5-10kHz) to add presence, and dip the upper mid-range to reduce listening fatigue. This is called a "V-shaped" frequency response, and it makes everything sound impressive during a 30-second demo.
But when you're mixing on those headphones, you're working against that coloration. You'll add less bass thinking it's already present. You'll reduce highs to compensate for artificial brightness. The result? Your mix sounds thin and harsh when played on neutral playback systems car stereos, studio monitors, or consumer earbuds.
Studio headphones operate on a completely different principle: they aim for a flat frequency response. That means they reproduce frequencies at relatively equal levels across the audible spectrum (ideally within ±3dB according to audio measurement standards). This accuracy is what lets you make mixing decisions you can actually trust.
Closed-Back vs. Open-Back: What Actually Matters
Before we dig into specific models, let's settle the biggest decision you'll make. When you're shopping for studio headphones, you'll encounter this choice immediately and it's crucial to understand what you're actually trading off.
Closed-back headphones
Closed-back designs seal the ear cup completely, trapping sound inside. This acoustic approach delivers three practical benefits:
Deeper bass response: Because sound energy stays contained in the sealed chamber, low-frequency output increases naturally. This matters for electronic music, hip-hop, and any genre where bass balance is critical. Professional mixing engineers often use closed-back headphones specifically to verify bass translation accurately.
Room noise isolation: When your monitoring environment isn't acoustically treated (which describes most home studios), closed-back headphones block outside noise. You can work in typical home environments and still hear what's actually in your mix, rather than competing with background sound.
Privacy and recording isolation: If you're tracking vocals or recording instruments, closed-back headphones prevent audio from bleeding into microphones. They also prevent your monitoring from leaking into the room during recording sessions.
The trade-off is that closed-back designs can create a narrower, more "in your head" soundstage after extended listening periods though quality models minimize this effect significantly.
Open-back headphones
Open-back designs allow air to pass through the ear cup back, creating a fundamentally different acoustic experience. The benefits are equally concrete:
Wider soundstage: Your brain perceives stereo separation and spatial depth differently through open-back designs. This closer-to-speaker presentation helps you evaluate stereo balance, panning decisions, and spatial effects more naturally.
Reduced ear fatigue: Many mixing engineers report that open-back headphones feel more comfortable during multi-hour sessions. The acoustic venting reduces pressure buildup that closed-back designs can create.
Natural tonal character: Open-back designs often sound more "neutral" because they don't emphasize bass response through sealed-chamber resonance. For critical mixing work, this can actually be an advantage.
The significant drawback: open-back headphones leak sound everywhere. Your recording captures every note you're monitoring. Anyone nearby hears everything you're listening to. They're unsuitable for tracking or shared spaces.
Practical takeaway: Start with closed-back if you're recording or working in non-isolated spaces. Add open-back headphones as a secondary reference tool once you've established your primary monitoring setup.
Recommended For You
Evaluating Studio Headphones: What the Numbers Actually Tell You
Before evaluating specific models, here's what professional audio standards and measurement practices reveal about quality studio headphones:
Frequency response specification: Professional monitoring headphones target ±3dB flatness across 20Hz–20kHz—the full range of human hearing. Some manufacturers claim wider ranges (10Hz–40kHz), but research by audio scientists indicates that improvements beyond 20Hz–20kHz provide minimal practical benefit for mixing work. What matters is how accurately they reproduce the frequencies where music actually lives (roughly 80Hz–16kHz).
Impedance and sensitivity: Studio headphones typically range from 32–64 ohms impedance. Lower impedance works well with portable devices and weaker amplifiers. Higher impedance often indicates better sound quality but requires more powerful equipment. Sensitivity measurements (in dB) tell you how loud the headphones become at a given input level. Professional models typically deliver 85–110dB at standard reference levels.
Build durability metrics: Professional audio equipment typically survives 5–10 years of daily use. Quality indicators include reinforced headbands (metal rather than plastic), replaceable ear pads (expect $30–80 for genuine replacements), detachable cables (so cable failure doesn't destroy the entire unit), and metal construction in stress points.
Comfort specifications: Clamping force (measured in grams of pressure) and ear pad materials directly affect how long you can wear headphones comfortably. Professional models typically target 200–400 grams of clamping force enough to stay secure without causing headband pressure headaches. Ear pad materials (velour, leather, memory foam) affect both comfort and acoustic properties.
Top Studio Headphones: What Professionals Actually Use
Entry-Level Professional Studio Headphones ($60–$170)
Audio-Technica ATH-M20x ($60–80)
The M20x represents genuine value in professional audio. These closed-back headphones deliver a fundamentally accurate frequency response suitable for learning mixing fundamentals. Build quality is solid metal headband, replaceable ear pads, detachable cable. Where they trade off compared to pricier models is in comfort during marathon sessions and fine detail retrieval in the upper mid-range.
Professional context: Students, podcasters, and home producers starting their first setup frequently choose the M20x. You're not getting the refinement of more expensive models, but you're getting honest monitoring that won't teach you bad habits.
Audio-Technica ATH-M50x ($150–180)
The M50x has achieved something rare in audio: nearly universal professional acceptance. You'll see these in broadcast facilities, video game studios, and recording rooms worldwide. This consistent industry adoption matters, it means multiple generations of engineers have verified that mixes made on M50x headphones translate reliably to other playback systems.
The frequency response is balanced across the spectrum without significant peaks or dips. The closed-back design provides useful isolation without exaggerating bass. The build includes all the professional features: detachable cable, replaceable ear pads, reinforced construction. Comfort is solid for 6–8 hour sessions, though some users report ear fatigue beyond that.
Sennheiser HD 599 SE ($140–170)
The Sennheiser HD 599 SE offers natural sound with its open-back design, creating a spacious soundstage like real speakers rather than the typical “in-your-head” headphone effect. Its 40mm driver delivers a balanced response from 20Hz to 20kHz without bass or treble boosts, so you hear music as intended. Comfort is excellent for long sessions thanks to memory foam ear pads, an adjustable headband, and velour materials that reduce ear fatigue during 6+ hour listening marathons.
The tradeoff: open-back design leaks sound, making these unsuitable for recording or shared spaces, but this transparency provides the neutral tone professionals prefer for critical listening. Build quality meets Sennheiser’s durability standards—replaceable pads, detachable cable, and metal-reinforced headband ensure 5–10 years of use, offering lasting value over disposable options. Choose the HD 599 SE for honest home listening without isolation; avoid if you need noise blocking or vocal tracking.
Mid-Range Professional Studio Headphones ($200–450)
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X ($220–299)
The DT 770 has maintained professional respect since the 1980s, an unusual achievement in audio equipment. The "Pro X" revision updates the design with refined drivers and improved comfort features. These closed-back headphones deliver a slightly bright frequency response (emphasis around 4–5kHz and 10–12kHz), which actually serves a practical purpose: it helps you catch detail and presence issues that warmer headphones might mask.
Build quality is exceptional. Beyerdynamic uses metal construction throughout, replaceable ear pads, detachable cables, and reinforced headbands. Many professional engineers maintain a DT 770 Pro Xpair as a secondary reference specifically for detail-checking work.
Real-world application: If you're mixing electronic music, podcast audio, or anything where upper-mid range clarity matters, the 770 Pro X's bright tuning can actually accelerate mixing decisions.
Sennheiser HD 490 PRO ($480–560)
Sennheiser's professional entry emphasizes balanced frequency response and comfort. The 490 PRO delivers a genuinely neutral sound signature, no artificial presence peaks, no bass emphasis. The ear pads use premium memory foam. The headband distributes weight evenly, enabling comfortable 8+ hour sessions.
Professional context: Mixing engineers who spend entire days at the console often choose the 490 PRO specifically for comfort without sacrificing accuracy. The build quality is solid, though not quite at Beyerdynamic's level.
Beyerdynamic DT 1770 PRO ($400–499)
This is where Beyerdynamic demonstrates their flagship technology. The 1770 PRO uses closed-back design with refined drivers delivering exceptional imaging (you can pinpoint stereo position with precise accuracy). The frequency response is similar to the DT 770 but with tighter, more controlled bass and more refined detail retrieval throughout the spectrum.
When it matters: If you're mixing stereo sources, effects-heavy work, or anything requiring precise spatial awareness, the 1770 PRO's superior imaging becomes genuinely valuable.
Open-Back Professional Studio Headphones ($150–350)
Philips SHP9500 ($80–120)
Want to experience open-back monitoring on a minimal budget? The SHP9500 delivers legitimate open soundstage at entry-level pricing. Comfort is excellent due to lightweight design. The frequency response is reasonably neutral. Build quality is basic plastic construction, non-replaceable ear pads, but the acoustic performance is solid for the price.
Practical use: Many engineers use the SHP9500 as an accessible introduction to open-back listening before investing in premium models.
Sennheiser HD 560S ($200–249)
Sennheiser's mid-range open-back option delivers spacious soundstage with neutral frequency response. The design includes replaceable ear pads and detachable cable, extending lifespan. Comfort is solid for several-hour sessions.
Professional application:Home studios often use the Sennheiser HD 560S as a secondary reference pair for final mixing phases. The open soundstage helps catch stereo balance issues that closed-back designs sometimes mask.
AKG K712 Pro ($400–500)
AKG's open-back design emphasizes natural soundstage and balanced frequency response. The K712 Pro delivers exceptional comfort and a genuinely wide stereo image. Build quality is decent, though not quite matching Sennheiser's durability standards.
When professionals use these:Mixing engineers working primarily on stereo music (not tracking-focused work) often choose the AKG K712 Pro for the final mix phase alongside closed-back headphones for earlier stages.
Professional/Premium Tier ($800+)
THIEAUDIO Monarch MKIII ($800–900)
THIEAUDIO brought their in-ear monitor (IEM) expertise to over-ear headphones. These are technically IEMs rather than traditional headphones, requiring proper fit for acoustic accuracy. For users whose ears match the design well, the frequency response is exceptionally balanced and the build quality rivals premium headphones.
Consideration: IEM fit varies significantly by ear anatomy. These work brilliantly for some people and don't work well for others.
HEDD Heddphone Two ($1300–1,500)
HEDD's approach uses planar-magnetic drivers a fundamentally different technology than the dynamic drivers in most headphones. Planar drivers can deliver exceptional transient response, meaning they reproduce fast-moving audio (drums, snares, percussive elements) with precision that dynamic drivers sometimes struggle with.
Professional context: Electronic music producers and mixing engineers working with complex rhythmic content sometimes prefer planar designs specifically for this transient accuracy. Build quality is premium. The semi-open design creates spacious monitoring without the complete isolation loss of fully open-back headphones.
Sennheiser HD 800 S ($1,500–1,700)
The HD 800 S represents one of the most respected headphones in professional mastering studios worldwide. These open-back headphones deliver exceptional frequency response accuracy, precise imaging, and a genuinely spacious soundstage. Professional measurement data consistently shows the HD 800 S among the flattest-measuring headphones available.
Why professionals invest:When you mix on HD 800 S headphones and translate to studio monitors or other systems, the correlation is consistently high. That means fewer surprise issues requiring revision. For commercial mixing and mastering work, this investment often pays for itself in reduced revision time.
Build quality is premium throughout. Replacement parts are available. Many mastering engineers maintain HD 800 S headphones as their primary reference specifically because of this reliability.
Specialty and Legacy Options
Sony MDR-7506 ($100–130)
The Sony MDR 7506 has remained in continuous production since the 1980s a genuinely rare achievement indicating lasting professional value. You'll find these in broadcast booths, video production facilities, and recording studios globally. The closed-back design delivers useful isolation. Build quality is legendary for durability.
Why professionals maintain these: As secondary reference pairs, the 7506 provides a consistent reference point. Because so many studios use them, you know exactly how mixes made on your primary headphones will sound on the ubiquitous 7506.
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro (original, $150–200)
The original DT 770 Pro (without the "X" update) remains viable for professional work. Beyerdynamic's durability standards mean 10+ year old units still function perfectly. If you find a used pair at reasonable cost, they represent genuine value.
What the Research Actually Shows About Headphone Translation
Here's what matters for mixing decisions:Multiple peer-reviewed studies in audio engineering indicate that mixing on quality headphones with a flat frequency response produces results that translate reasonably well to speaker-based monitoring, provided you understand your headphone's characteristics.
The key finding from research by the Audio Engineering Society and professional studios: engineers who spend time learning how their specific headphones translate (checking mixes on multiple playback systems) develop reliable mixing instincts on those headphones.
What this means practically: The "best" studio headphone isn't determined solely by frequency response charts. It's the headphone you'll use consistently, trust implicitly, and learn to translate reliably. That might be a $150 pair or a $1,500 pair, the consistency of use matters more than the price point.
Making Your Choice
Starting your first studio on a strict budget
Choose the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x . This represents the performance-to-price ratio that professionals consistently validate. You'll learn accurate mixing fundamentals without financial strain. Spend saved budget on acoustic treatment, which matters more than headphone luxury at this stage.
Mixing professionally with moderate budget:
Select either Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X for detail-revealing bright tuning, or Sennheiser HD 490 PRO for comfort and neutral balance. Both produce mixes that translate well. Choose based on whether you prefer slightly bright or perfectly neutral monitoring.
Serious mixing/mastering work:
The Sennheiser HD 800 Sdelivers the measurement accuracy and professional adoption that justifies the investment. If cost is prohibitive, the Beyerdynamic DT 1770 PRO offers 90% of the performance at roughly 30% of the price.
Adding reference monitoring: Once your primary monitoring is established, add Sennheiser HD 560S or AKG K712 Pro as open-back reference tools for final mixing phases.
Recording and tracking simultaneously: You absolutely need closed-back isolation. Choose ATH-M50x or DT 770 Pro X and skip open-back designs for now.
Final Recommendation
The best studio headphone is the one that remains on your head consistently for months, builds familiarity through repeated use, and eventually becomes an extension of your mixing process. Professional mixing engineers don't succeed because they own expensive equipment. They succeed because they understand their equipment thoroughly and make informed decisions within its limitations. Start with quality headphones in your price range. Use them daily. Reference your mixes across multiple playback systems. Over time, you'll develop genuine instincts about how your monitoring translates. That accumulated experience, not the price tag determines whether your mixes actually work in the real world. When you eventually upgrade, you'll do so from knowledge rather than guessing. That's how professionals build genuinely reliable monitoring systems.